Tuesday, February 15, 2011

The Ruins (2008)


3 out of 5 living vines



@BretEastonEllis was right when he said via Twitter, "The Ruins is a totally underrated horror film". Curious about what one of my favorite non-horror author`s horror recommendation would be, I quickly downloaded and enjoyed this movie with a nice bowl of rice, fried tofu and lots of sesame seeds.

Like myself, most fans of B-horror films will understand that no one really famous ever signs up for these movies, only those stars who are on their way to possibly becoming famous. That being said, I was surprised to see Jena Malone of Saved! glory as the lead actress. Honestly, I thought she would have gotten better work after having done that movie but I guess I was wrong. Either that or the call of a hot-body horror flick was just too strong to resist.

Also appearing is Shawn Ashmore, better known to me previously as Iceman from the X-Men trilogy (soon to be a prequel! SCORE.) Although Ashmore wasn`t astounding in the mutant action-drama, I still had him pegged in my head as at least a decent person because he was part of the team. I know, it`s ridiculous to give movie stars actual, real-life credit for things their agents may choose for them, but that`s how I work. Anyway, even after being afforded that extra credit, Ashmore still failed me in this movie, despite his awesome college-hippie-beard.

Getting into the story, it`s your typical moronic-Americans-on-vacation setup with 2 couples at a resort who meet a nice German-ish guy who happens to know someone working at an archaeological dig site far from the comfy resort at which they`re currently lounging by the pool. Once the group is able to convince Malone`s Ms. Goody Two-Shoes to go on the adventure, the ominous music sets in and we sit back, ready to take in the heavy foreshadowing as well as gratuitous nudity that all but guarantees certain death before the credits roll.

From there on, the story develops respectably well and we`re at least treated to a plot twist or two before everyones dead. Kidding! Not everyone dies, you know. I`m sure we`ve all seen enough horror movies by now (think Halloween or Scream) to know that there`s gotta be at least 1 character left over at the end to keep things open and profitable for a sequel, should the production gods deem it so.

If you like gore or at least a more dramatically necessary type of gore that`s not just Saw gore, I think you`ll get your fill in this movie. As usual, I had to scrub past the gore due to the yet to be eaten rice and tofu, juicily gazing at me from my bowl. Honestly, in what movie would missing the gory scene really affect your overall understanding of the movie? If I can guess what`s going to happen before it actually happens and then review the event through the dialogue afterwards, I don`t see why I should have to waste precious dream-energy to fight off an unreasonably macabre dream later that night. I`m sure whatever I imagine will be just as horrible, if not worse than what any special effects supervisor can show me. But just to be sure of my belief, I did a quick scrub back through the gore and was proven right. For no reason would I ever have needed to see that and regret seeing it because now as I`m typing about it, I`m having phantom pains in my knee.

Sidenote, if you can speak any sort of Spanish... Forget that. If you can order from a Taco Bell Menu, then you will be enjoyably appalled at every actor`s complete lack of any language ability at all in this movie. Seriously, it`s really fun to watch. One girl tries to communicate with the locals in a stressful situation and her boyfriend, the great Jonathan Tucker, calls her back with the "leave it to me, I know what I`m doing" look. He then proceeds to look at the local man in question with a serious face and says, "SeƱor". Yup. That`s his big situation-controlling line of strongarm negotiation. When the man, who`s obviously an indigenous Mayan (because they said so 2 minutes earlier) doesn`t understand his amazing linguistic feat, he says it two or three times more, each time getting more and more impassioned but sadly without even a "por favor", he soon gives up. Thankfully, this character doesn`t do much more talking until the end of the movie when he makes an impassioned go-down-fighting speech to the other characters. This is the point when we are finally made aware of Jonathan Tucker`s speech impediment. Tucker had hidden it pretty well before this point but in this speech, we are showerd with more "not S, but SH" glory that most people can handle in a single sitting. I hope that this lisp was a strange character choice and not how Tucker actually talks because that would be a bit disappointing to have that voice matched with such a good body. However, the only quote from The O.C. I can remember certainly would ring true here, "God doesn`t give with both hands."

And that brings us to the end of the movie. I`m trying harder now to not spoil the movie for our thousands of readers who have yet to see each film. We wouldn't want any sour pusses now would we? You should definitely see this movie if you enjoy cheesy horror movies with unreasonable plots and half naked actors.

- B

Sunday, February 6, 2011

King's Speech, The (2010)


4.5 S S S Stammers out of 5

Best Picture Nominee AND based on a true story (my soft spot).  I had to see this movie because the official question for January 2010 was "Have you seen the King's Speech?"  I got tired of saying no, so I overpaid and saw this movie in theatres.

This movie is GREAT and gets a rating of 4.5, but I must admit that I am a bit disappointed.  People had hyped this movie so much so that I thought I would be walking out of the theater with my jaw dragging behind me.  Not even close.  Was it a great movie? Yes.  That's where my quick and dirty summary would end though, there is NO NEED for people to be fainting at the mere mention of the movie's title like people are presently doing.  People lets get over it! We've been acting like we've been forced to watch Renne Zelwiger and River Pheonix movies for the last 10 years! We know better!

Again, let me clarify, GREAT movie.  But because people have decided to horribly over-rate this movie, I have to knock it down to its rightful place in movie history.

Colin Firth performance may be one of the best in history though. I will always hold on a high pedestal an actor that can CONVINCINGLY play a person that is insane, has a stammer, mentally retarded, etc.  Playing one of these physical disabilities commands the upmost respect.  This guy's performance gets a 5 out of 5.

-Gerard

Reservoir Dogs (1992)

3.5 Plot Twists out of 5

Overall great story, highly entertaining, and good all around movie.

You can never get enough of these types of movies where you are putting together a puzzle and you are kept guessing every step of the way.  The blood and language of this movie was a bit excessive at times but you really don't mind it because its different and it kind of fits the description of the characters.

Some parts of the movies seemed a bit fake, but it ultimately didn't matter.  In my opinion the value of this movie is in some of the dialogue and the overall story.

A story like this is easy in nature to conceptualize, but has to be very tough to execute.  Tarantino pulls it off flawlessly.

This is one of these "must see" movies for all movie fans but doesn't rank anywhere close to one of the best movies of all times, as some people hype it up to be.

Bill Reilly loves this movie.

-Gerard

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Antichrist (2009)




3 rusty scissors out of 5

HOLY SHIT. This movie made me cringe and scream so much that I couldn`t even watch it on my television. A full screen experience with surround sound would have overwhelmed my previously-believed-to-be-strong-but-now-fragile senses. If you watched this movie in the theatre, you should receive a Purple Heart. I had to watch the entire movie in front of my computer with my mouse poised over the VLC scrubber. So I`m going to start out by saying that I did watch this movie in its entirety, albeit a sped-up and somewhat censored version.

If you`ve ever thought that Willem Dafoe was generally odd looking man, your thoughts will be affirmed again and again in this movie by Lars von Trier. I`ve always been and still am impressed with Dafoe`s work in movies. But I`ve always been creeped out as well. However, in my humble opinion as a performer, I think that eliciting such a strong emotion (skeevicity) from an audience is quite a feat. So, big urban props to Willem. However, I just couldn`t handle the level of skeevicity that was portrayed in this movie. Nor could I handle the amount of screen time his naked body was awarded in this film. I believe that he and his movie-wife, Charolette Gainsbourg, copulated at least 8 times in the span of 108 minutes. And each time, it was this epic event of close up genital shots, unattractively straining back muscles and usually ended in gore, violence or unbridled rage. Seriously, within the first 3 minutes of the movie, you`re shot in the face with a full screen shot of shower penetration. No condom, no blur, no artistic avoidance of genitalia; just full-on, hardcore shower fucking. It`s a very intriguing mix of disgusting violence and in your face eroticism that allows this movie to make you feel turned on and nauseous at the same time. This movie is not recommended for the following groups of people: Catholics, Jews, Republicans, Americans not residing within a coastal state, victims of sexual assault, prudes, parents and (spoiler) people who don`t like vaginal mutilation or blood-cum.

Having gotten that out of the way, this is a beautifully made movie. If only the contents weren`t so shocking and overwhelming, I really would`ve enjoyed it a lot more. The music is very moving, the shots artfully composed and the slow-motion that`s captured is so detailed and rich. It`s definitely not the work of a B-movie team that just wants to shock their audience. It`s more like the experimental work of an experienced artist who is well versed in how to exquisitely portray the most haunting of images in a way that`s somewhat stomachable.

Do not, under any circumstances, see this movie with your girlfriend unless she`s super cool and well adjusted and has seen something that could train her for this like Deliverance or Requiem for a Dream. This is definitely a 400 level senior seminar in the realm of shocking movies. So the least one can do before watching it is take the 101 introductory course.

- B